Monash Admin, Author at IMPACT: Monash Business School | Page 17 of 23

In Focus

COVID-19
Climate Change

View

Articles
People
Videos
Podcasts
Departments & Research Centres
Contact us
RSS feeds

Topics

Accounting
Auditing
Banking
Behavioural economics
Big Data
Business
China
Climate Change
Corporate regulation
COVID-19
Digital disruption
Diversity
Economics
Economy
Energy
Experimental economics
Health economics
Investing
Labour market
Leadership
Legal
Management
Marketing
Organisational performance
Retail
Superannuation
Sustainability
Tax
Trade

Subscribe to our newsletter

Your Search Terms:

Posts of this
Author

Forty years of anti-discrimination law — how far have we come?

Legal - 24 Apr 2018

Forty years of anti-discrimination law — how far have we come?

Anti-discrimination law was introduced in Victoria in 1978. But after 40 years we don’t seem to be any closer to equality for all. Could establishing a corporate watchdog be the answer?

Future predictions: revolutionising the accuracy of business forecasting

Big Data - 11 Apr 2018

Future predictions: revolutionising the accuracy of business forecasting

Anticipating customer demands into the future can be tricky. But a new tool could revolutionise the accuracy of business forecasting.

Regulating litigation funding in the public interest

Legal - 28 Mar 2018

Regulating litigation funding in the public interest

Two legal inquiries are currently underway into litigation funding; but just how much regulation is enough?

‘Nice rice’ dishes up more food, profits and sustainability

Economy - 18 Mar 2018

‘Nice rice’ dishes up more food, profits and sustainability

A new farming technique that tackles global food scarcity has revealed increases in both rice crop yields and farmers’ profits. But its broader implications could lead to a more sustainable environment.

Observing the Russian election

Digital disruption - 14 Mar 2018

Observing the Russian election

As the presidential elections get underway in Russia, a unique online platform providing real-time monitoring of internet performance may offer some insights.

When men talk about super, women stay silent

Superannuation - 28 Feb 2018

When men talk about super, women stay silent

Australians turn to their co-workers for advice on super, rather than professionals. But there is a surprising gender aspect to this.

Prisoners of healthcare: Intimidated patients are similar to hostages

Health economics - 14 Feb 2018

Prisoners of healthcare: Intimidated patients are similar to hostages

Patients who feel unable to assert themselves in the presence of doctors and medical staff negotiate as if they are being held hostage.

Buyer beware: greater bankruptcy disclosure required for franchisees

Marketing - 14 Feb 2018

Buyer beware: greater bankruptcy disclosure required for franchisees

Bankruptcy rates among franchisees can be a dirty little secret for franchises: but there may be a simple fix.

Energy justice: What is it and why do we need it?

Energy - 14 Feb 2018

Energy justice: What is it and why do we need it?

We devour energy at a truly ravenous rate; but it has an increasing social cost. How can policymakers balance these competing demands?

Younger, female accountants among the most stressed

Accounting - 14 Feb 2018

Younger, female accountants among the most stressed

Accountants employed by consulting or law firms, along with young women, are reporting higher levels of workplace stress.

Has the World Bank got a problem with its poverty figures?

Economy - 12 Feb 2018

Has the World Bank got a problem with its poverty figures?

The World Bank has claimed a significant decrease in global poverty. But has it set the measurement bar too low?

People don’t know much about Australia’s High Court and that’s a worry

Legal - 1 Feb 2018

People don’t know much about Australia’s High Court and that’s a worry

New research shows we are woefully ignorant about the function of the High Court. (Note to Australia: our Chief Justice is not Judge Judy.)

Subscribe to our newsletter

We acknowledge and pay respects to the Elders and Traditional Owners of the land on which our four Australian campuses stand. Information for Indigenous Australians

In Focus

COVID-19
Climate Change

View

Articles
People
Videos
Podcasts
Departments & Research Centres
Contact us
RSS feeds

Topics

Accounting
Auditing
Banking
Behavioural economics
Big Data
Business
China
Climate Change
Corporate regulation
COVID-19
Digital disruption
Diversity
Economics
Economy
Energy
Experimental economics
Health economics
Investing
Labour market
Leadership
Legal
Management
Marketing
Organisational performance
Retail
Superannuation
Sustainability
Tax
Trade

Registered higher education provider

ABN 12 377 614 012

CRICOS Provider Number

Monash University: 00008C
Monash College: 01857J

Authorised by

Monash Business School

Maintained by

eSolutions Service Desk

Accessibility
Disclaimer & copyright
Terms & conditions
Data privacy & cyber security
Data Consent Settings

Copyright © 2021 Monash University

SUBSCRIBE TO IMPACT

* Mandatory

First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Job Title

Organisation / Institute

Country

My relationship** with Monash University (tick all that apply):
I'm an alumnus, friend or supporter (including donors, mentors and industry partners)
I'm a Monash student
I'm interested in studying at Monash
I recently applied to study at Monash
I'm a Monash staff member
I recently participated in research activities or studies with Monash
Other

I agree to receive marketing communications from Monash Business School. Monash University values the privacy of every individual's personal information and is committed to the protection of that information from unauthorised use and disclosure except where permitted by law. For information about the handling of your personal information please see Data Protection and Privacy Procedure and our ** Data Protection and Privacy Collection Statements.

If you have any questions about how Monash University is collecting and handling your personal information, please contact our Data Protection and Privacy Office at dataprotectionofficer@monash.edu.

REPUBLISH

Terms

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons licence. You may not edit or shorten the text, you must attribute the article to Impact, and you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email mbus-impact@monash.edu

License

Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives

Title

People don't know much about Australia's High Court and that's a worry

Content

<p class="figure__caption">iStock</p>
<h2>New research shows we are woefully ignorant about the function of the High Court. (Note to Australia: our Chief Justice is not Judge Judy.)</h2>
<p>Last year, the High Court of Australia heard some pivotal cases, including the legality of the same sex postal vote and the seven parliamentarians who potentially held dual citizenship.</p>
<p>It all made media headlines; yet a new Australian survey into public awareness of the High Court of Australia shows that we know little about the judges of the High Court making these significant decisions.</p>
<p>The first of its kind in Australia, the research shows most people struggle to identify the names of the High Court Justices, while few knew the number of Justices on the Court, how the Justices are appointed, or for how long they serve.</p>
<p>In fact, more survey participants knew of the US television judge known as Judge Judy than were able to identify any member of the Australian High Court, including Australia’s first female Chief Justice, Susan Kiefel.</p>
<p>Still others were confused about whether the Australian High Court had heard a legal appeal from former US celebrity and convicted felon, OJ Simpson.</p>
<h1>Significant shortcomings</h1>
<p>Carried out by Professor Russell Smyth, Deputy Dean (Academic Resourcing) at Monash Business School and Professor Ingrid Nielsen at Deakin Business School, the Australian work builds on a similar US study, which showed that public support for the courts is strongly linked to their level of understanding about how they work.</p>
<p>For Professor Smyth, the Australian results point to a significant shortcoming in our understanding of the High Court, which can lead to confusion and cynicism around other executive functions.</p>
<p>The survey also revealed a mixed awareness about some of the recent high profiles cases heard by the High Court.</p>
<p>“Lacking awareness of the Court, the general public will invariably mix up the roles of the Court, on one hand, and the Parliament and the Executive on the other, leading the public to imply to the Court a more overt political role than is warranted,” he says.</p>
<p>“Given the relatively low esteem in which the Australian public holds its politicians, lacking awareness of the different roles of politicians and judges reduces the esteem in which the Court is held by the public compared to the situation if the Court was known to be less political.”</p>
<h1>Lack of recognition</h1>
<p>They carried out a survey of a representative sample of 520 adult Australians over a two-week period last November. The researchers also examined the extent to which variation in the general public’s awareness of the High Court can be attributed to differences in participants’ age, education and gender.</p>
<p>They also tested awareness of recent High Court cases and compared how well people identified High Court judges against major political leaders in Australia, the US and UK. These were compared to US public awareness of major US Supreme Court decisions.</p>
<p>Few knew the names of the Justices, the number of Justices on the High Court, how the Justices are appointed or for how long they serve. Fewer than one in 10 participants were able to identify most of the Justices of the High Court. However, researchers found age and education are better predictors than gender of differences in awareness levels.</p>
<p>But awareness of recent cases decided by the Australian High Court was mixed. More people were aware of two very visible 2017 cases – the legal validity of the plebiscite on same-sex marriage and the ‘Citizenship Seven’ (involving members of parliament ostensibly holding dual citizenship). These on a par with public awareness in the US of major Supreme Court decisions.</p>
<p>However, there was low awareness of the less visible Julian Knight case, which tested the legal validity of Victorian legislation preventing the release of the convicted murderer.</p>
<p>Respondents were also unsure whether Australia’s High Court heard a case concerning the legal validity of capital punishment (Australia does not support capital punishment).</p>
<p>More worryingly, many were not sure whether it had heard a failed appeal in 2015 from OJ Simpson to overturn his kidnapping and armed robbery conviction in the United States.</p>
<h1>Wrong judge</h1>
<p>When asked “What political office does Susan Kiefel currently hold?” less than 13 per cent had a more-or-less correct answer of Chief Justice; compared to the 20 per cent who identified Judy Sheindlin. (Answer: she is Judge Judy.)</p>
<p>Respondents whose answers were ‘nearly’ correct were incorporated due to US research which argued this showed they have some level of awareness.</p>
<p><iframe class="wp-embedded-content" sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" title="What job or political office do these people currently hold?" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/LsVJS/7/#?secret=6KKtnOCjlk" data-secret="6KKtnOCjlk" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="885"></iframe></p>
<p>The Australian results compared unfavourably with awareness of the major political leaders in Australia, the US and UK.  Some 91 per cent of respondents identified US President Donald Trump; 86 per cent identified Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull; 77 per cent correctly identified Opposition Leader Bill Shorten; and 85 per cent recognised the UK Prime Minister, Theresa May.</p>
<p>Public awareness of how the Justices are selected, how long they serve and how many Justices (and female Justices) there are on the Court was also much lower than in the United States.</p>
<p>“There are important reasons why we should care about the level of public awareness of the High Court and this is something that we are now looking at in some follow-up research,” Professor Smyth says.</p>
<p>“The idea that awareness is very low is what we expected. There is no other Australian research on this topic and Australia is a hard test because the judges are not really in the spotlight, unlike in America where the Supreme Court is more politicised.”</p>